The unique attack method used to disrupt the code-sharing site GitHub over the last week could have been prevented if more web sites enabled encryption, said the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF).
The attack against GitHub was enabled by someone tampering with regular web site traffic to unrelated Chinese web sites, all of which used a JavaScript analytics and advertising related tool from Baidu.
Somewhere on China’s network perimeter, that analytics code was swapped out for code that transparently sent data traffic to GitHub, at times crippling parts of the popular web site, particularly two projects that specialise in anti-censorship tools. It was also particularly insidious since the users whose traffic was modified didn’t know they had been roped into the attack.
It was also a clearly orchestrated affair, as it required “privileged access to backbone routers within its borders to modify the Baidu resources,” wrote Bill Budington, an EFF software engineer.
The reason GitHub’s adversaries were able to swap out the code is because many of the Chinese web sites were not encrypting their traffic, indicated by “HTTPS” in the URL, Budington wrote.
Not by default
“This was only possible due to the fact that the Baidu Analytics script included on sites is not using encryption by default,” Budington wrote. “Without HTTPS, anyone sitting between the web server and the end user can modifying the content arbitrarily.”
The EFF and other privacy groups have been advocating for some time that all web sites move to HTTPS. Traffic exchanged with a client is encrypted, which prevents interlopers from reading it if it is intercepted, and it also makes it hard to figure out what page within a domain a person is accessing.
But HTTPS can be tricky to set up, and it’s complicated when a web site uses content from other sources, such as advertising networks, which also need to make the change.
For its part, GitHub is fully HTTPS encrypted. That has made it hard for China to censor the site on a per-URL basis. It could simply block the entire site as it did in January 2013, but that move drew criticism from a Google executive who said it also hurt Chinese developers, Budington wrote.
Two projects
The latest attack focused on two projects, one that mirrors the content of publications including The New York Times and another project run by Greatfire.org, a group that monitors web sites censored by the Chinese government and develops ways for Chinese users to access banned services. Those specific URLs were not working as of Wednesday evening, although the rest of GitHub appears to be working.
One solution would be for Baidu, which has not been implicated as complicit in the attacks, to ensure its analytics script uses HTTPS, Budington wrote.
Even if Baidu does that, there are still ways to interfere, however. The Chinese government could force Baidu to turn over the private keys it uses to encrypt traffic, which then would allow visibility into the data, Budington wrote. Or, the government could force Baidu to deliver its malicious code.
GitHub’s problems came just ahead of the signing of an executive order by President Barack Obama that authorises sanctions against perpetrators of cyberattacks. The sanctions are intended to act as a punishment when nations are unwilling or unable to crack down on those responsible, Obama said.
Hacker sanctions
The US has become increasingly aggressive in laying blame for cyberattacks, which it claims have damaged businesses. In mid-December, North Korea was blamed for the devastating attacks against Sony Pictures Entertainment. Obama subsequently authorised even more sanctions against the already marginalised country.
In the first legal action of its kind in May 2014, federal prosecutors charged five members of the Chinese Army with stealing trade secrets from US organisations over eight years. China denied the accusations.
Jeremy Kirk, IDG News Service
Subscribers 0
Fans 0
Followers 0
Followers