Docker, Microsoft, HPE partner to port legacy apps to containers
20 April 2017 | 0
In theory, moving legacy apps into containers ensures that neither the apps nor the business that depends on them gets left behind. In practice, such lifts-and-shifts are easier said than done. Sometimes, they are only said and are never done at all.
Docker has announced a professional services programme to help relieve the heavy lifting of porting legacy applications to containers.
The Docker Modernize Traditional Apps Program, delivered in conjunction with such partners as Microsoft and Hewlett Packard Enterprise, is the first step in converting apps to use modern IT principles. It also shows how Docker and its partners can derive revenue from an open source technology stack apart from selling enterprise editions of a product, providing professional support for it, or hosting for it.
Move on over
Docker claims it takes at most five days to port most applications into a containerized environment, although the company also makes it clear this is not the entire process. It is only the first step, and it can be intimidating to take if a given app is old or undocumented.
In the keynote speech on the second day of DockerCon 2017, Docker CEO Ben Golub used the term “past-proof and future-proof” to describe the advantages of moving legacy apps to containers. About half of Docker’s customers, according to Golub, are still working with traditional applications.
Containerising an application does not automatically remove all its technical debt, but there are long-term benefits to putting an old-school business app into a container as-is without changing how it works. For one, the application’s lifecycle becomes easier to modernise, as Microsoft Azure CTO Mark Russinovich pointed out to InfoWorld’s Eric Knorr.
Microsoft’s Taylor Brown, lead program manager for Windows Server and Hyper-V Containers, and Chris Van Wesep, director of product marketing for Enterprise Cloud, spoke in an interview of their experiences with Microsoft customers looking to make that leap. Most of them, Brown said, can make a basic leap for an app in about a week.
Microsoft sees that many of the apps in question are “custom-built .Net applications, where the person who wrote it left the company five years ago. The thinking around such app is, ‘It runs, let’s not break it.’” Visual Basic 6, VB .Net, C++, and FoxPro apps also pop up often.
“If it takes [the conversion process] more than about five days,” said Brown, “then it’s a bigger app than they thought, and it’s probably going to require some more complexity. But for most of them, in a couple of days they’re up and running.”
With more complex applications, the third-party help offered through Docker’s partners comes into play. There, says Brown, having experienced hands dedicated to the task is a big boon.
“It’s about understanding, what is the app I go look for?” said Brown. “How do I even go find that app? What are the steps involved to do it? How do I get the infrastructure set up for it? They’re not things that you can’t find on your own, but these are people who are putting fires out all day…. I have a lot of confidence in time people will do it [themselves], but this is a catalyst for that.”
Once the companies see the process, said Brown, they realise it is not that hard, and they have a recipe to accomplish it on their own. In Microsoft’s case, it gives legacy .Net customers a possible on-ramp to the new, open source .Net.
“With the .Net folks,” said Van Wesep, “they want to do it. They just don’t know [what] the path forward has been. It’s an opportunity for us to get back with them and say, ‘There’s a lot of investment that’s been made here recently. Let us show you how you can make use of that.’”
Go modern or go home?
Many of the issues Docker has highlighted with this program are about overcoming the divide between legacy and modern IT practices that exist in numerous organizations—even those that currently use containers.
Most containerised applications these days are newly created, greenfield deployments, rather than ports of existing apps. But even in enterprises where new apps are spun up in containers first, many old apps live on untouched because they work as-is—or because the company has a history of partial or failed migrations in the same spirit.
Both Docker and Microsoft are hoping what they offer will loosen up inhibitions about such moves. Given the number of apps that remain in VMs and on bare metal, both companies are conscious of the revenue that can be garnered from “commercialising the process of getting customers moved forward,” as Brown put it.
Even with the biggest customers, those are likely to be short-term, one-time events—an adjunct to monetising containers for enterprises only. The real long-term profits, as before, will come from providing enterprise services that feature containers as headline offerings.
IDG News Service