AI assistants and chatbots gain traction in enterprise
5 April 2018 | 0
Despite concerns over data privacy and immature technology, AI assistants and chatbots are gaining a foothold among businesses, according to a report from IT professional network Spiceworks.
The report, which surveyed 529 IT professionals from North America and Europe, showed that 29% of respondents have implemented one or more chatbots or intelligent assistants for work-related tasks, or plan to do so this year.
“AI assistants and chatbots are being deployed within organisations. IT departments account for the majority of use cases (53%) — perhaps unsurprising, since IT pros tend to be early adopters of new technologies and may be testing the tools ahead of wider business deployment”
Adoption was higher for larger organisations, which have more resources to evaluate emerging technologies, with 24% using AI assistants or chatbots currently and 16% set to deploy the technology this year, for a total of 40%.
“A lot of businesses are starting to see how these technologies are useful, and because they are more widely available, we are seeing adoption increase,” said Peter Tsai, Spiceworks senior technology analyst and the author of the report. He added, however, that the technology is still “in its infancy.”
How are AI assistants being used?
AI assistants and chatbots are used in a variety of ways, the most common of which is voice-to-text dictation (cited by 46% of survey respondents), while 26% have used them to support team collaboration tasks and 24% deploy them for employee calendar management. Other use cases include email management (14%), customer service (14%), IT help desk management (13%) and data analysis (10%).
The report also indicates where AI assistants and chatbots are being deployed within organisations. IT departments account for the majority of use cases (53%) — perhaps unsurprising, since IT pros tend to be early adopters of new technologies and may be testing the tools ahead of wider business deployment.
The IT department is followed by administrative and business management (23%) and customer service and support (20%). Marketing and sales — both 16% — are also using the technologies, while there are low levels of adoption in accounting and finance (9%), research and development (7%) and human resources (7%).
Cortana leads in the workplace
While Microsoft’s Cortana is lagging in the consumer market, it was found to be the most widely used AI assistant in the workplace, thanks to its integration into Windows 10. Of the respondents that have already implemented intelligent assistants or chatbots, 49% are using Cortana, while Apple’s Siri — which is built into iOS and macOS — is used by 47%. Google Assistant is used by 23%. Cortana is not currently available in Ireland, though it can be enabled by altering region settings in Windows 10. Microsoft has not been able to say when Cortana will be available in Ireland, but has confirmed to TechPro Magazine that it is working to make the service available.
Amazon Alexa has made less of a mark, despite being the most popular consumer AI assistant. Only 13% of respondents are currently using Alexa, though a further 15% of organisations plan to use it in the next 12 months. As well as announcing a partnership with Microsoft that will see Alexa integrated into new Windows 10 laptops, Amazon has launched its Alexa for Business service aimed at boosting enterprise adoption.
Some businesses may have been put off by Alexa’s initial positioning as a consumer-focused assistant built into smart speakers for the home, Tsai said. “There was a conversation about a year ago where people were concerned about privacy, especially in a business setting, with an app that originates from Amazon. People are concerned about the always-listening features with some of these intelligent assistants,” he said. “That might also be a concern among IT professionals.”
Chatbots are also making their mark in the workplace. Fourteen percent of organisations are using chatbots within collaboration platforms such as Slack and Microsoft Teams, and adoption is likely to increase significantly over the coming year, with a further 16% expected to adopt the tools. However, businesses appear to be less keen on creating their own custom chatbots, with only 2% having done so; 10% plan to do so in the next year.
Barriers to adoption — privacy concerns and immature tech
While there is interest in business applications for AI assistants and chatbots, there are various drawbacks to the technologies that are holding back wider use, the report said.
The primary reason for not implementing these AI systems is their limited use cases, cited by 50% of respondents who said they do not plan to adopt the technology.
This is likely because the technology is “still evolving,” said Tsai. For example, the top complaint among chatbot and intelligent assistant users is that the software “misunderstands what you are trying to tell it, or it doesn’t understand nuances in human dialogue, slang or jokes, or colloquial speech.”
This makes businesses wary of investing in the technology. “If you have to put more effort into the technology to get it to do what you want, you are not really getting a good return on your investment,” he said. “It seems that many people will adopt intelligent assistants and chatbots in the future, but maybe right now the technology is not quite there yet.”
Twenty-nine percent of respondents said concerns around security and privacy are holding them back from implementing AI systems. This is particularly the case in regulated industries such as healthcare, where organisations are dealing with sensitive information, said Tsai. “There are a lot of regulatory concerns there. You don’t want to divulge details and have them saved by a third party on someone else’s servers, which would obviously violate privacy regulations.”
Other reasons organisations have chosen not to implement AI assistants and chatbots, according to the report, include cost (cited by 25% of respondents), a fear of employee distraction and lost productivity (19%), accuracy concerns (15%), a lack of support from management (14%) and training requirements (13%).
IDG News Service and TechCentral Reporters