Outsourcing customers not sold on supplier ‘innovation’ claims NOA

Hammer and spanner
(Image: Stockfresh)



Read More:

11 May 2015 | 0

Outsourcing customers have become more content with suppliers, but are not convinced by ‘innovation’ claims, according to the UK National Outsourcing Association (NOA).

The NOA, partnering with financial technology supplier Polaris, surveyed 158 of its members to discover how buyers and sellers “bring added-value to their outsourcing relationships”.

The research found that 92% of buy-side professionals agreed that outsourcing delivers business value, and 81% believed that outsourcing has made their company more competitive. Over a third (36%) primarily used outsourcing to improve their service.

But suppliers believed things were going better than their buyers did, with suppliers perceiving clients were benefiting 9% more than the clients themselves. Also, the topic of “innovation” is “not delighting buyers”, with “innovation” running at a “success perception deficit” of 31%.

“Initiatives like ‘innovation labs’ are not as well received by buyers as the suppliers would hope,” said NOA. “Suppliers need to reinvent these activities in a way that makes their value clear — they must also always put people and relationship skills first.”

It added: “Buyers and suppliers should work together to foster innovation at appropriate levels, in order to generate a competitive advantage in their business. Above all, they need to get the basics right — building relationships and developing quality governances are both cornerstones of creating added-value in an outsourcing relationship.”

The future looks positive for outsourcing though, as the majority of buyers plan to increase the scope of their outsourcing (59%).

By 2017, shows the research, most new outsourcing contracts could be based around business outcomes, with 34% of buyers already using business outcomes frequently as part of contracts, and 36% of buyers planning to use them more.



Antony Savvas, IDG News Service

Read More:

Leave a Reply

Back to Top ↑