Big Data digest: how many Hadoops do we need?
19 January 2015 | 0
Say hello to Flink, the newest distributed data analysis engine on the scene.
This week, the Apache Software Foundation announced Apache Flink as its newest Top-Level Project (TLP). Apache also provides a home for Hadoop, Cassandra, Lucene and many widely used open source data processing tools, so Flink’s entry into the group speaks well of its technical chops.
Don’t worry if you hadn’t heard of Flink before — it came to a surprise to most. Like Spark, another emerging data processing platform, Flink can ingest both batch data and streaming data. Apache Flink got its start as a research project at the Technical University of Berlin in 2009.
Why would someone choose Flink over Hadoop? Performance and ease of use, say the creators of the software.
Data streaming, in-memory
The Flink engine exploits data streaming and in-memory processing to improve processing speed, said Kostas Tzoumas, a contributor to the project. Tzoumas is cofounder and CEO of data Artisans, a spin-off company that will commercialise Flink. It could serve as an ideal replacement for Hadoop for those who want faster performance.
Another advantage Flink offers is ease of use, Tzoumas said. Especially for large projects, the application programming interfaces (API) are an “order of magnitude” easier to use than programming for Hadoop’s MapReduce, according to Tzoumas. APIs are provided for Java and Scala.
Music streaming service Spotify and travel software provider Amadeus are both testing the software, and it has been pressed into production at ResearchGate, a social network for scientists.
Nonetheless, with Hadoop and Spark growing in popularity, Flink may face an uphill battle when it comes gaining users.
“Projects that depend on smart optimisers rarely work well in real life,” wrote Curt Monash, head of IT analyst consultancy Monash Research, in an e-mail. He pointed to other projects relying on performance enhancing tweaks that failed to gain traction, such as IBM Learning Optimiser for DB2, and HP’s NeoView data warehouse appliance.
Elsewhere, researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) are looking at ways to use data to help better plan routine tasks such as scheduling flights or helping mapping software find the best route through a crowded city.
Later this month, MIT researchers will present a set of mew algorithms at the annual meeting of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) that can plot the best route through a set of constraints.
Unlike current software that does this — think automated airline reservation systems — these algorithms can assess risk. For someone looking to get across town on a number of busses, it can weigh how often those busses are late and suggest alternatives where they make sense. The work is rooted in graph theory, which focuses on connections across multiple entities.
Speaking of graphs, database company Neo Technologygot some press this week for attracting $20 million (€17.2 million) in funding to help get its Neo4j graph database out into the enterprise market. Once largely an academic concern, graph databases are finally being used in production environments. Neo4J is used by Walmart, eBay, CenturyLink, Cisco and the Medium publishing platform, GigaOm reported.
While we think of computers as number crunchers, researchers are increasingly looking at ways they can work with the most slippery of data, human emotions.
New Yorker magazine has an article on a number of start-ups developing technology that can help computers read human emotions. It is a surprisingly robust field.
Author Raffi Khatchadourian tracks the history of one such company, Affectiva. Its software scans a face, identifying the main features (eyes, nose, eyebrows), and notes how the more movable parts of the face (the lips) change over time. Affectiva has built a huge database of facial expressions which can be used by its software to identify the emotional state of the user — be it happy, sad, confused or any one of dozens of other emotional states.
Agencies and networks
Naturally, advertising agencies and television networks are interested in any technology that can get a better read on humans. Verizon, for instance, once had plans for a media console that could track the activities of everyone in the room.
“All this data would then shape the console’s choice of TV ads,” Khatchadourian wrote. “A marital fight might prompt an ad for a counsellor. Signs of stress might prompt ads for aromatherapy candles. Upbeat humming might prompt ads ‘configured to target happy people.’ The system could then broadcast the ads to every device in the room.”
Those worried how this software could be used by marketers to badger consumers in ever more intrusive ways can at least take heart that it could also be used in less mercenary ways. Affectiva CEO Rana el Kaliouby, long a student of what she calls “affective computing,” was initially drawn to the possibilities of using the software as an “emotional hearing aid” to help autistic children better communicate with the world.
Joab Jackson, IDG News Service