TechCentral to your inbox


TECHPRO
Email Print
Look back in wonder

Veteran industry watcher TONY MULQUEEN looks back nostalgically at the evolution of the Irish IT industry.


News | 30 May 2005 : 

It’s all a question of where you’re sitting. Overlooking the Irish software industry from a height – say, from 30,000 feet by a complacent politician traveling first class – the view is of one of the key planks of the good ship Celtic Tiger. Phrases like ‘biggest software exporter in the world’, ‘hub of the semiconductor industry’ and ‘buoyant indigenous sector’ roll easily off the tongue. Nor are they without a measure of truth.

Ground Zero

The scene looks more like a battlefield littered with corpses. The list of companies who have perished is a long one. Almost every successful native company is headed by veterans bearing the scars of previous disasters and black days, as well as the memory of triumphs. And at various points – cyclical slumps in the mid-80s and mid-90s and the plunge of the early 2000s after the Internet meltdown and 9/11 – the overall scene looked more like a rout than a march to victory. For the ground troops of IT Ireland, it has been necessary to take Kipling’s advice about looking at triumph and disaster, and treating both imposters just the same.

Industry icons

The iconic example is Baltimore. At its height, a FTSE company with a bigger market cap than the Bank of Ireland; at the ignominious end, a heap of intellectual property bones picked over by the vulture capitalists. Baltimore were evangelists for the then un-adopted public key infrastructure and encryption systems that are now universally used by e-commerce. It would have been an epoch-making event for the Irish software industry if Baltimore had captured the market in the same way as Iona gained hegemony in the Orbix standard. Unfortunately, open standards are just that: open – to exploitation by others. Web browser makers like Netscape and Microsoft, server software vendors like Microsoft and Oracle, and web services builders like IBM and Sun all heard what Baltimore was saying. And all of them slowly but surely added the security bits to their products. There was no need to call Baltimore.

The success stories have attracted less ink than the failures, because success often involves investor exit strategies: merger, trade sale – and the possible disappearance of brand identity. But for investors – and the employees with stock options – these were life-changing events. Isocor, a developer of high-end e-mail servers and directory services, was US-owned but with most of its technology developed in Ireland. At the height of the Internet boom, it was sold to Critical Path for US$450 million. Critical Path still has a 90-strong division in Ireland, run by ex-Isocor executive Dara Mullen, and does business of over US$70 million annually in its chosen niche. But Isocor – the little company that could, and did – has faded from the public mind.

 

Mobile mover and shaker

Aldiscon was the classic example of an Irish company capturing a planet-sized niche. In the mobile boom that revived the Irish indigenous sector after dot bomb woes, Aldiscon’s product line dominated the SMS market. This was at a time when the heavily hyped WAP was occupying much mindshare. WAP fizzled, but millions of mobile users, especially younger ones, voted with their thumbs and the text messaging market became a goldmine. Aldiscon also did strong business in home location registers, the backbone of the systems that make billions of dollars for mobile operators from roaming charges. In 1997, Logica acquired Aldiscon for US$82 million, and Euristix, another telco niche vendor, went for around the same price that year too. Brands were diluted or vanished, but the expertise and confidence of innovative companies remained, with some staff fledging away to start their own ventures. Today, Ireland remains strong in SMS, with companies such as Púca continuing the wireless applications story. And even out of apparent failure came the future success. The staff at Aldiscon and Euristix were seeded with hardcore developers and top-gun technical deal-makers – from a company that had its hour in the sun but was eventually left adrift by changes in technology. Retix, a specialist in OSI communications software, was one of the cutting edge places to work in the early nineties. It didn’t respond nimbly enough to the massive uptake of internet standards, and the brand is now among the ranks of the fallen.

 

Retix alumni

Ex-Retix employees did more than swell the ranks of Aldiscon and Euristix. The Retix VP of engineering, Raomal Perera, was one of the founders of Isocor. He is today blazing a trail at mobile payment specialist Valista, whose platforms carried out over a billion mobile transactions for customers all over the world in 2004. Valista customers collectively recorded a 340% increase in premium services, which are rolled out to 150+ million end users - an achievement that’s starting to look mighty like another planet-sized niche captured by an Irish company. Declan Conway and Stuart Kelly took their Retix experience into co-founding Openet, specialising in payment mediation between mobile operators. Retix engineer Alan Robinson went on to head up Shenick, who develop high-end test environments for telcos who want to validate hot new services before going live. And there is still today a rump section of Retix trading from the original HQ in Dunlaoire. Re-branded as Airtel ATN, and providing standards-based systems to the airline industry, the company is led by Retix veteran, Frank O’Connor.

 

Compiler conquest

Glockenspiel, which eventually failed, is another software house spoken about in hushed tones among Irish geeks. The company had the confidence and expertise to tackle one of the blackest of computing arts – the development of a compiler. In this case the compiler was for a language – C++ – that was to dominate systems programming for decades to come. In spite of making it first to market with a C++ compiler, the company didn’t thrive financially and fell prey to a takeover by Computer Associates. Nonetheless, if you get to look at the CV of many a principal engineer or chief technology officer in Irish systems outfits, you will find that ‘Glock’ is present and correct at the start of the career curve.

Adaptable enterprises

Other companies have impressed less by stellar brilliance than by nimbleness in hard times and sheer staying power. Founded in the early seventies by ex-IBM technical gurus who saw a chance to compete with IBM’s own professional services, System Dynamics performed steadily if unspectacularly through the years when IT meant air-cooled monsters in “dinosaur pens” and legions of users working away at “Russian tellies” – the green-and-black terminals that preceded the PC. Code was cut in COBOL, and the customer base was the financials, large companies and government departments who were the major computer users of the period.

The untimely death in 1994 of charismatic founder Tom McGovern shook the company to the roots, and this came at a time of hard scrabble in the big computer sector. The emerging client/server trend was taking air away from the mainframe market. Heads of IT were under management orders to start adopting the flavour of the month, and mainframe budgets were trimmed. Taken over shortly after McGovern’s death by a British holding company called Arrival, System Dynamics was one of the boats lifted by the rising tide of mainframe services in the run up to the millennium. Old COBOL hands were back in demand as the Y2K bug played a lead role in the nightmares of IT managers across the land.

The late nineties also saw the company come under the flag of Insight founder Tony Maguire, and back into Irish hands. After some adventures in the American software market, System Dynamics is once more on its traditional turf: the care and feeding of the code running on the big machines in the air-conditioned rooms. And the big machines aren’t going away any time soon.

As well as hardy annuals, the Irish services sector has provided examples of acorns grown into oaks. LAN Communications was founded by Sean McNamee and two colleagues who parted from Apple resellers Typetec in 1993. Like the Three Musketeers, the founders had contrasting characters that worked brilliantly together: the ebullient CEO, the canny business developer and the technical guru. The three of them worked from tiny serviced offices on Baggot Street, fired by a vision with laser focus. Big networks were on the way up. Cisco was the dominant technology. LAN Communications would form a strong relationship with Cisco, and in time, with other leading network hardware vendors. They would grow a powerful technical team and install the biggest and most advanced networks in the land. And that is pretty much what happened.

 

Fast forward

Today, LAN Communications is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Eircom, but it trades under its own well respected brand, with thousands of successful customer installations to its name. It’s the largest systems integrator in the country, with annual revenue of €50 million, over a thousand customers and 130 employees: a long way indeed from the trio in Baggot Street. E-learning – the use of computer software as a learning tool – was a poster child of the dot com era: nowhere more so than in Ireland, where it held the promise of a sector where native talent could bring Irish companies to world-leading status. Unlike the chip market dominated by Intel, and the office productivity sector ruled by Microsoft, here was a niche where indigenous capabilities – a strong educational infrastructure and a new generation of Irish entrepreneurs capable of operating at a global level – mattered at least as much as inward investment. Companies such as SmartForce and Riverdeep led the way, swiftly taking on the lucrative US market and growing into market-dominating companies in the process. Recent years have brought more bad news than good, as outfits such as EMC, Unlimited and NetG either went to the wall, were taken over, or severely downsized. Suddenly, e-learning looked like a crowded house on this island. A slew of take-overs and consolidations gobbled up the smaller players: for example, Intuition acquired EmergeSmart, Unlimited and EMC.

In other cases, consolidation enabled strong niche players to take on the heft of global operations: for instance, the entry of Electric Paper into the ThirdForce group backed by the pioneering e-learning entrepreneur, Pat McDonagh. That move brought the company the potential to evolve beyond a commanding position in the computer literacy sector, and onwards into the lucrative educational market. Recent ThirdForce announcements have included a major deal with British publishers Harcourt and Australia’s largest ICT project for schools. Previous Electric Paper success stories have included breaking into the Arabic, Chinese and Latin American markets.

The e-learning companies that have survived the shakedown now have the wind behind their sails. The original teething problems in the area can be summarised as follows. A gold rush in e-learning around 2000 spawned a me-too mentality where everyone in sight seemed to have new e-learning products. A general lack of understanding of what e-learning really is saw some truly awful products – some no better than PowerPoint slide shows – brought to market, giving the e-learning sector a bad name in the process. Standards had yet to be defined, and there was no herd of references or success stories to point to.

These problems have been generally resolved, as market leaders emerge, financial security is put in place, and the success stories gather momentum. Standards have gained maturity, too – for example, ECDL and ICDL as definitions of computer literacy, and SCORM as a measure of e-learning design and delivery. And the wide adoption of internet and web standards has provided a common delivery platform that is a lot easier for companies or governments to buy into than bespoke solutions. For Ireland, world leadership in e-learning is a tangible, achievable goal.

 

US behemoths

From the plane cruising at 30,000 feet, the cut and thrust of the Irish software development scene is nearly invisible to the naked eye. The view is dominated by the American giants: the Microsoft campus in Sandyford, with futuristic buildings set among green lawns; the mighty Intel complex, itself looking like a circuit board from this height; the vast car parks surrounding Dell units – alleviating the top issue of the politician: jobs, jobs, jobs.

The politicians and their servants at the IDA care little that the top geeks want to work in small companies doing ‘core development’. What played well on the news was the stream of jobs announcements as Dell, Microsoft and Intel dug in for the duration. The good news stories might hit a speed bump from time to time, as Intel delayed a fab plant, a manufacturer like Gateway departed the scene, or Apple took a fit of the blues. But by and large the inward investment story has been an excellent one, and a major driver of Ireland’s economic success.

The reasons for this success are the subject of frequently asked questions, not least because if we don’t identify the reasons, there’s a good chance the business will be taken away from us. The Irish corporate tax rate, underlined with gusto by our jealous neighbours, is undoubtedly a factor. The UK has done us a massive favour by remaining outside the euro zone and allowing sterling to become expensive. For historical reasons, Irish people gel well inside American corporate culture, and the English language is a unifying factor rather than a reminder of colonial days. And an influential trend, strangely enough, has been emigration, followed by immigration.

Irish men and women worked in US companies, and came back with the corporate vocabulary and attitude that Americans understood. Irish men and women went to Europe, and elsewhere, and came back with spouses from those countries. Some of these spouses were to become the core of a major Irish success story: the localisation industry. Often, the Irish half went to work in one of the tech start-ups that were bubbling away, while the spouse went to Microsoft or one of the localisation companies that were feeding an insatiable appetite for new language products.

The demands of global leaders such as Microsoft, Lotus, Claris and Symantec drove localisation from an ad hoc cottage industry to a highly formalised process. Much of this development – including standards, automation software and specialist project management – happened here. Localisation stands shoulder to shoulder with data communications, e-learning and mobile applications as an area where Ireland can claim world-class competence. While much of the spade work such as translation nowadays takes place in the target countries, the shots are called from Ireland.

The big hardware houses are perhaps the places with the lightest allegiance to Irish skills. Past experience has shown that hardware manufacturing is portable, though it’s fair to say that fab plants are less portable than computer assembly. As Irish operations grow more costly, it gets harder to justify manufacturing here. Irish staff have faced stiff competition from Eastern Europe, India, and an increasingly tigerish China. Irish managers have played hardball at the board table to keep projects on Irish soil. Leaders such as Intel remain vocal about on-going loyalty to their operations here. Nonetheless, the successful long-term future of Irish IT industry leadership has more to do with those small, chaotic start-ups and the daring and vision of the people who started them.


 



Enjoyed this article? Share it with others!

Digg Delicious Reddit Stumble facebook Newsvine Linked In



Please make a comment


What do you think?

Name:   Email:
Your email address will not be published
Comment:
(Max. 1000 chars.)


(Note: If you cannot read the numbers in the above image, click here to generate a new one.)